August 19 2018 / Rating: 6.6 / Views: 458

Research paper criteria - Research Paper Judging Criteria Kingdom of Drachenwald

For each criterion, the respondent had to indicate, on a scale of 1 10, how important they thought the criterion was, with one being the least important and ten being the most important.

Indicate accurately the subject and scope of the study, Rarely use abbreviations or acronyms unless they are commonly known, Use words that create a positive impression and stimulate reader interest, Use current nomenclature from the field of study, Identify key variables, both dependent and independent, Reveal how the paper will be organized, Suggest a relationship between variables which supports the major hypothesis, Is limited to 5 to 15 substantive words, Does not include redundant phrasing, such as, A Study of, An Analysis of or similar constructions, Takes the form of a question or declarative statement, If you use a quote as part of the title, the source of the quote is cited usually using an asterisk and footnote, Use correct grammar and capitalization with all first words and last words capitalized, including the first word of a subtitle. Numerous universities, including Stanford, Georgia Tech, and Harvard University have made efforts to write internal guidelines defining authorship. This application lets readers explore data and other quantitative results submitted with the article, providing insights into and access to data that is otherwise buried in plots. The design of the study should include information on the type of study, the research population or the sampling frame, and who can take part e. Another common mistake is writing an unfocused review that is lost in the details.

Sponsors of sessions also are encouraged to arrange them thematically, and groups are encouraged to co-sponsor sessions.

We discuss the implications of these findings for researchers, especially new graduate students, to help navigate the discrepancy between official policies for authorship and the contributions that faculty truly value. Judges should represent different perspectives in the group, including different universities. 4 points The author argues the importance of their argument and results.

stating that uncontrolled dumping leads to environmental problems, submissions that are of very narrow interest, and those reporting findings lacking comparison to existing data, will not be deemed of sufficient relevance for introduction into the peer review process. Manuscripts that have a primary focus on biology should be submitted in this category while manuscripts that have a primary focus on materials should be submitted in the Basic Research Technology category. Your paper should be the number of pages I specify, double-spaced, with a 12 point font.

While numerous scientific and publishing organizations have written guidelines for determining author qualifications and author order, there remains much ambiguity when it comes to how these criteria are weighed by research faculty.

This shows the importance of coming up with a good research paper title when you are drafting your own manuscript.

If necessary supplementary text, tables, and figures may be published as additional information only in the on-line version of the article. When a large multi-author group has conducted the work, the group ideally should decide who will be an author before the work is started and confirm who is an author before submitting the manuscript for publication.

Does the article have a bibliography or reference list? Clinical profile of PiB-positive corticobasal syndrome.

A System Dynamics Approach to Study Virtual Communities.

These questions are asking whether the author has moved beyond the stage of merely reporting what others say, and into the stage of being able to think creatively about the topic. Is the presentation of results clear and accessible? Finally, I evaluate whether the methodology used is appropriate.

1 Supporting materials illustrations, artifacts, charts, graphs, etc.

All articles are peerreviewed to safeguard the scientific quality of the publication and are circulated to journal subscribers. If you have time, make suggestions as to how the author can improve clarity, succinctness, and the overall quality of presentation.

It should answer the question of why and what why the research needs to be done and what will be its relevance. As a rule of thumb, I roughly devote 20 of my reviewing time to a first, browsing of the paper 40 to a second reading that includes writing up suggestions and comments 30 to a third reading that includes checking the compliance of the authors to the journal guidelines and the proper use of jargon and 10 to the last goof-proof browsing of my review.

With regards the body of the Abstract you need to make a clear statement of the topic of your paper and your research question. Objectives should be simple not complex, specific not vague, and stated in advance not after the research is done.

One gets to know super fresh research firsthand and gain insight into other authors argument structure.

The corresponding author should be available throughout the submission and peer review process to respond to editorial queries in a timely way, and should be available after publication to respond to critiques of the work and cooperate with any requests from the journal for data or additional information should questions about the paper arise after publication. The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers.

However, patients with similar corticobasal syndromes can have pathologies that are not CBD. Judges should represent different perspectives in the group, including different universities. I don t have a formalized checklist, but there are a number of questions that I generally use. This helps me to distinguish between major and minor issues and also to group them thematically as I draft my review. What is more, many students will continue to do research throughout their careers, which is one of the reasons this topic is so important. I never use value judgments or value-laden adjectives. Although a plastic folder or some other kind of binder may seem an attractive finishing touch, most instructors find such devices a nuisance in reading and commenting on students work.

Introduction The introduction should briefly review the pertinent literature in order to identify the gap in knowledge that the study is intended to address and the limitations of previous studies in the area.

The Editor may reject manuscripts that exceed these limitations.

Some instructors prefer papers printed on a single side because they re easier to read, but others allow printing on both sides as a means of conserving paper follow your instructor s preference.

Submissions like these should be submitted to journals covering agronomic or medical issues. Username Password Check the status of your submitted manuscript in EES Username Password Track accepted paper Once production of your article has started, you can track the status of your article via CiteScore 4. Your thesis completes the sentence I am trying to convince the reader that. The patient groups are relatively small compared with the data used to derive the Armstrong et al criteria. Only the main title of each criterion listed above in bold was provided to the survey respondents. The BMJ requires that all those designated as authors should meet all four ICMJE criteria for authorship, and all who meet the four criteria should be identified as authors.

The final step of the paper submission, which involves final edits and proofreading, had a median of 5 10, again indicating that most respondents do not necessarily have a strong opinion about this criterion.

collaborative filtering for Improved Is the Subject Area Surveys applicable to this article? A major limitation has been the similarity of clinical phenotypes between CBD and CBD mimics caused by other pathology such as Alzheimer s disease AD. 2017 International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Review Research Article Technical Note Country Report Editorial Discussion Review A review article provides a significant insight and critical analysis of the literature into a specific topic, deemed to be of high relevance in the field of waste management.

Generally don t use graduate students as judges, unless the graduate student has a unique area of expertise necessary to judge a research paper. For example Dexamethasone was found in this study to be a factor that was associated with reduced inflammation, can be edited to Our results demonstrated that dexamethasone reduced inflammation. When authors co-submit and publish a data article in Data in Brief, it appears on ScienceDirect linked to the original research article in this journal.

This format is sometimes called hanging indention, and you can set your writing program to create it automatically for a group of paragraphs.

Henry Sauermann of the Georgia Institute of Technology for providing input on an early version of this manuscript and providing constructive criticism. Thesis is not fully supported by evidence and or does not raw specific conclusions. In addition, there is a limit of a total of 4 figures and 4 tables. Double your efforts to proofread your final draft in order to catch these old errors that will come back when you least want them to appear. If there are any aspects of the manuscript that I am not familiar with, I try to read up on those topics or consult other colleagues.

For example, a study on cytotoxicity of a material should be submitted in the Basic Research Technology category, even if it was performed in animals with histological analyses. APA Style Title page and any section headings follow APA format. Clarity Presentation Relative to the subject material, is the paper understandable without requiring too much effort on the part of the reader? This should not be limited to providing information on how or from whom the ethics approval will be taken, but this section should document the issues that are likely to raise ethical concerns. Short titles are the most effective. Recognition, reward and responsibility Why the authorship of scientific papers matters.

Tags: #research criteria, #criteria